The closing date for the part time TOps job has moved to
11pm Tuesday 5 January so obviously the response to the offer has not been as
high as expected. In an interview with
the FT published yesterday Mike “Brown” Brown was asked about the funding gap created
by George Osborne’s spending review which over the next five years will leave TfL
short of an estimated £2.8bn or £4bn depending on whether you believe him or
the GLA transport committee.
He trumpets their grandiose plans to build homes and
offices over depots and stations, what I like to think of as the “Railtrack”
approach, predicting that this will raise £3.4bn over the next ten years. He admits that some projects could be cancelled
but they will try to find ways to make others cheaper which is bitterly amusing
as LU’s track record of doing things cheaply is less than stellar. One fine example is the current dog’s dinner
they’ve made of resignalling the SSLs which Mike Brown knows all about as when
Bombardier were awarded the contract in June 2011 he was managing director of
LU.
On Night Tube he said “I am not going to just pour money
to sort out disputes. That may have historically
been what has happened in this place but it’s not going to happen anymore
because it can’t. I don’t have the money”. As TSSA revealed this time last year LU’s own
estimation was that Night Tube will lose £19.6m in its first year of operation
and isn’t expected to break even for 17 years.
If that estimate was calculated using the original plan with existing
TOps working nights and accepting their first “final” pay offer then it’s safe to
assume that figure has gone up a bit.
I know £19.6m isn’t much but if Mike Brown is looking at
ways of saving money cancelling Night Tube would a good start, we can forget
all the changes to life/work balance with bonuses for this or that and get on
with sorting out a straight forward pay deal.
Telling Joanna Lumley she can pay for her own Garden Bridge would be
another and selling the Cable Car as scrap metal would probably raise more
money than it costs to run it. Sadly we
can’t do much about the Borisbus, we’ll be lumbered with those until they rust
because nobody else is stupid enough to want a bus with three doors, two
staircases and are so heavy they can’t legally be at full capacity.
I actually had the misfortune to get on one, a 73 going
down Oxford Street, on my way from having a gander at the new TCR (impressed)
to Marylebone Farmer’s Market (the only place I know where I can get Crispins
which Old Mother shrugged swears make the best baked apple). I went upstairs and can confirm the reports
that the roof is very low, the windows are small and the general ambience is
pretty gloomy compared to other top decks.
When I got to my stop I went down the rear stairs and it was only when
the door opened that I noticed that this was one of the “new” NB4L with a
normal “plug” door at the back instead of the sliding door, pole or rear
platform.
Boris may have only four months left as mayor but we’ll
be paying for his incompetence for many years to come.
Happy New Year, folks, vote Sadiq!
They better not be playing that old tory trick or creating deficits in a public body in order to say:
ReplyDelete"Well your x billion in debt now so what we need is investment. Privatization to the rescue!"
-
Property can make money but that land should be used to benefit the communities overall not as a deposit box for overseas investors.
An affordable home is not and should not be a 350000 1 bed flat.
Following the collapse of Metronet and Tube Lines I don't think the private sector is particularly interested in taking over the Tube unless the government is prepared to subsidise them up to the eyeballs. Maybe they think Zac will lose so they're leaving a problem for Sadiq to handle which the next Tory candidate can use as ammunition in 2020.
DeleteUnsurprisingly the current mayor is not interested in benefitting the community nor is he interested in public sector bodies holding onto property which could provide future revenue through rents when it can be sold of for short term funding.
Agreed about the new Boris buses. The one I got on had a conductor on who does not conduct but assists. Cramped, dark and all the worst elements of "retro". Engines that are already outdated and let's not go there on the lack of opening windows. Can't remember the unit cost but no doubt far too much. Just hope the new mayor leaves the bus decisions to someone who knows what they are doing (and does not insist on a new fancy uniform - though the new coats are nice and warm almost making up for the pyjama style shirts - apparently ties are no longer compulsory).
ReplyDeleteI love how the bendies were axed chefly because people (and I don't mean TfL - I mean passengers!) were concerned about fare-dodging. And so perfectly serviceable three-door buses with boarding allowed through all doors were replaced by... new three-door buses with boarding allowed through all doors! Plus the conductors explicitly do not have revenue protection written into their job contracts. You couldn't make it up!
DeleteIn terms of savings, I'd like to know how much money LUL is looking to save by replacing the 'stand on the right' signs on the escalators with LED screens displaying ever-so-helpful messages such as 'do not sit on the steps' or 'hold the handrail'...
DeleteAgree re the BorisLardMasters.
ReplyDelete"Vote Sadiq" - really?
both he & Zac are lying shysters I wouldn't trust further than I could spit, actually.
One of those two "lying shysters" is going to be Mayor of London in four months, its a simple choice of the one who voted to cap fare rises or who voted against
Delete